YourLawyer.com® 1-800-LAW-INFO (1-800-529-4636)

Medtronic Defibrillators Leads


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Medtronic Defibrillator Defective Sprint Fidelis Lead

Keywords:  Medtronic | Lawyer | Defibrillator |Attorney | Lead | Fidelis | Lawsuit

On October 15, 2007, Medtronic announced that it was suspending sales of the Sprint Fidelis lead, a vital component in its implantable defibrillators.   According to Medtronic, the Sprint Fidelis lead, a wire that connects the Medtronic defibrillator to the heart, could fracture inside a patient’s blood vessel, delivering a massive electrical jolt.   This malfunction can cause extreme pain, or in the worse case scenario, it can be fatal.   At least 5 deaths have already been linked to a malfunctioning Sprint Fidelis lead used with an implantable Medtronic defibrillator.

The Sprint Fidelis lead have been used in implantable Medtronic defibrillators since 2004, and most patients who received the devices since then have the faulty leads.   Sprint Fidelis leads were used only in cardiac defibrillators -- or complex devices with defibrillation capacity -- and not in conventional pacemakers. Some patients with congestive heart failure use devices that included this defibrillation ability, and those were among the machines that use the Sprint Fidelis lead.

Medtronic Defibrillator Lead Recall
Medtronic decided to suspend sales of the Sprint Fidelis lead after a company review of 30 months of data showed that the defibrillator lead had a continuing fracture problem.   According to the company’s own estimate, approximately 2.3%, or 4,000 to 5,000 people with a Sprint Fidelis lead will experience fracture within 30 months of having a Medtronic defibrillator implanted.   Those patients whose Sprint Fidelis lead fractures will require a dangerous surgical procedure to have the wire replaced.

For the unlucky patients who experience a fracture of a Sprint Fidelis lead, three things can happen.  If they are fortunate, the implantable defibrillator will beep, alerting the patient to seek immediate medical attention.  Or, the fracture can create a massive electrical shock that causes the patient extreme and sudden chest pain.  But most disturbingly, the fracture of a Sprint Fidelis lead can deplete the Medtronic defibrillator’s battery.  If this happens, the Medtronic defibrillator can fail to deliver a necessary, life-saving shock to the heart. 

In addition to suspending sales of the Sprint Fidelis lead, Medtronic also recalled all unused leads on the market.  The company also advised patients with Medtronic implantable defibrillators that may have used the defective Sprint Fidelis lead to see their doctors.  Replacing leads on an implantable defibrillator is far more risky than replacing the device itself, so the company was not advising that patients with a Sprint Fidelis lead have those replaced.  Rather, it urged physicians to reprogram the defibrillators to minimize the problem.  Medtronic said the new programming would allow the implantable defibrillators to better monitor and warn of problems with the Sprint Fidelis leads.

Medtronic Defibrillator Charging Problem

On April 16, 2004 Medtronic announced that it was recalling two heart defibrillators because they have been linked to at least four deaths and one injury. Medtronic said that some of these defibrillators have failed to charge properly which can result in the late delivery or no delivery of cardiac shock therapy.

The charging problem involves the Medtronic Micro Jewel II Model 7223Cx and the Medtronic GEM DR Model 7271 implanted cardioverter-defibrillators. Medtronic said that most of these devices were implanted in 1997 and 1998. About 1,800 are thought to be still in use.

These devices are used to shock the heart into normal rhythm after patients suffer irregular heartbeat or fibrillation, which are rapid, life-threatening arrhythmia's, originating in the lower chambers of the heart. The defibrillators are implanted surgically in the chest. When a cardiac arrhythmia occurs, the capacitor is charged and the device delivers the appropriate shock.

Medtronic said that with the suspect defibrillators, the capacitors may take longer than normal to charge near the end of the battery service life and could cause a delay in delivery or no delivery of shock therapy. A delay or no delivery of shock therapy can be life threatening.

Medtronic Defibrillator Lawsuit Lawyers
If you or a loved one suffered injuries from a Medtronic Defibrillator, please fill out the form at the right for a free lawsuit case evaluation by a qualified defective medical device attorney.
Medtronic Defibrillators LeadsRSS Feed

More Claims Filed over Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Leads

Nov 5, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Three more lawsuits have been filed against Medtronic, Medtronic USA, Medtronic International Technology, and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations, reports the Madison Record. The three individuals, residents of Illinois, allege in their 60-count suit, that they suffer sudden shocks after being implanted with defective defibrillators made by the device maker, according to the Madison Record.The complaints state that Lillian Tengstrand, Effie Thomas, and Marcus Williams received the implantable...

Grassley Putting More Heat on Spine Surgeon with Medtronic Ties

Sep 23, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) has expanded his investigation of  Dr. David Polly.  As we've reported previously, the relationship between Dr. Polly, head of spine surgery at the University of Minnesota, and  Medtronic Inc. has been under scrutiny.Grassley's probe of Dr. Polly has already revealed that he had been paid $1.2 million by Medtronic between 2003 and 2007 for consulting work. Dr. Polly had come under fire in July for not disclosing his relationship with Medtronic...

Medtronic Advisory Says Some Concerto, Virtuoso Defibrillator Batteries May Deplete Prematurely

Sep 11, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Medtronic Inc. has issued an advisory for 6,300 Concerto CRT-D and Virtuoso implantable defibrillators.  According to the advisory, the batteries on these devices may be depleted sooner than normalAccording to a letter sent to physicians, the devices affected by this advisory will give a 90-day advanced warning if the batteries are nearing depletion. Medtronic maintains that the battery issue  does not compromise device functionality or affect therapy delivery.  The company said...

Lawsuits Allege Medtronic, Other Firms Illegally Marketed Surgical Ablation Products

Jul 16, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Medtronic Inc., St. Jude Medical Inc., AtriCure Inc. and Boston Scientific Corp. all allegedly paid kickbacks to doctors in order to convince them to use their surgical ablation products to treat the heart-rhythm defect called atrial fibrillation, according to lawsuits recently unsealed in Texas.   According to The Wall Street Journal, the lawsuits were filed by former employees of the companies.Allegations of kickbacks by medical device makers are nothing new.  For example, in...

Medtronic Warned on SynchroMed Drug Pumps, MiniMed Insulin Pump Manufacturing

Jun 25, 2009 | Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
Medtronic Inc. has received a warning letter regarding its SynchroMed II  Drug Pumps and MiniMed Paradigm Insulin Pump.  In the letter, the Food & Administration (FDA), cites Medtronic for taking too long to recall the SynchroMed pumps.  The letter also said that  an inspection conducted  last year at the Puerto Rican plant where both pumps were made found that Medtronic failed to establish and maintain quality controls in manufacturing.SynchroMed II pumps are...

More Medtronic Defibrillators Leads News

Medtronic Defibrillators
* Denotes required field.

Title

* First Name

* Last Name

* Email Address

* Phone Number

Cell Phone Number

Office Phone Number

Street Address

Apartment/Suite

City

State

Zip Code

Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

Date of birth of person injured
(mm-dd-yyyy):

Which Medtronic Defibrillator was implanted?

If other, what is the name of the defibrillator that was implanted?

Date the device was implanted:

Is the device still implanted?


What medical condition prompted the use of the device?

Please describe any problems or injuries caused by the device:

Other Info:

No Yes, I agree to the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

Yes, I would like to receive the Parker Waichman Alonso LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

please do not fill out the field below.

Home | Defective Drugs | Medical Devices | Toxic Substances | Accidents | Product Liability | Malpractice | Diseases
Nursing Home Negligence | Food Poisoning | Other Topics | Social Security Disability | Contact
Statement of Clients' Rights | Site Map | Drug Injury Search | Vioxx | Mesothelioma | Permax | Dostinex | Composix Kugel Mesh X Large Patch
Ortho Evra | Fosamax | Personal Injury Lawyer | Fusarium Keratitis | Stevens Johnson Syndrome | Florida Personal Injury Law Firm

© 2002-2009 YourLawyer.com®. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Attorney Advertising

Parker Waichman Personal Injury News